绿林网

《无名姐妹》经典影评集

《无名姐妹》经典影评集

《无名姐妹》是一部由蒂娅·莱辛 / 艾玛·皮尔德执导,纪录片主演的一部美国类型的电影,以下这些影评,希望对大家能有帮助。

《无名姐妹》影评(一):goodbye,Jane

我们都只是非常普通的女人,我们想拯救其他女人的生命。我们想要每一个联系我们的人都能成为她们故事的主角。我们感受到了这种动力,说出这句话让我们充满了力量:“我们一定会做到这件事的”。所以我们想把我们的力量,这句话带给我们的感受分享给那些在她们自己的生活中没有感受到这么多力量的人,我们觉得,就是这样了,然后我们继续走完我们的人生。我们曾一起在最需要的时机,做了那件最需要的事情,我们做到了,然后我们要去做别的事了,我们的工作结束了。所以,永别了,Jane。

Jane在七年间,为芝加哥的11000名女性提供了非法的、安全的堕胎手术,她们有的只能支付一美元有的没有钱。

Janes说,我们收你能支付的最大费用。

最初做手术的是男人,他们无法理解,为什么Jane的成员可以收取如此低额的费用、冒着被监听被逮捕的风险去提供帮助。男人说:“圣经告诉我,付出劳动,就要收取费用”

可是女性不会,他们说,they need help, they’re depressed.

You know how women fight.

我始终认为且坚信,女性是这个世界上汇聚了最多美好品质的类别和物种,男性的压迫和凝视没有能够让她屈服,女性永远在维护和自己同病相怜的人,维护弱者,反抗一切不正当的制度和法律。

她们不屈、乐观、勇敢、善良、认真、尽责。

1973年1月22日,美国最高法院宣布堕胎合法化。

good bye,Jane

《无名姐妹》影评(二):致敬勇敢的伟大独立妇女

没想到在失眠的夜里能挖到一部小众到才两百多人看过,但是更新了本人个人top10的女性主义题材纪录片。

故事讲禁止堕胎时期的上世纪六七十年代的芝加哥,一个民间女性组织自发团结起来为无力支撑出国接受正规手术的女性进行堕胎的故事。因为最初提供联络号码的女性为自保化名为Jane,“如果需要帮助,就联络Jane”,后来组织里每个人都是Jane。

访谈形式的纪录片,没有戏剧冲突,没有表演,没有情感爆发,只有画面模糊的上世纪美国街头的空镜、作为考据的黑白老照片、以及一群经历过Janes平静地一人一句跟你讲着故事的女人。没有一句对话不动人,没有一位女性不伟大。

“女人仅仅因为她们的女性身份就在不断地遭受意外死亡。”

“我清楚地知道这是非法手术,我可能会被逮捕,但那时候我根本不在乎。”

“姑娘们有很多故事跟我讲,讲她们必须要堕胎的理由,我想跟她们说的是,你根本不需要为自己想要堕胎而争辩。”

“有谁会想要将自己的房子借出去用于非法的堕胎手术一整天呢?但我的室友同意了,她没有提出任何条件。”

“她们在违法,我们也一样,所以我们只能彼此信赖了。”

“她说不不不不不不不不,我可不想跟你们的案子扯上关系,我说我需要你接,所以她接了。她不要我们认罪,也不要我们说一些夸夸其谈的政治颂词,她不怕政治,也不惧怕权威。”

……

“我们都是普普通通的女人,但我们仍然想要拯救其他女人的生命,想要每一个联络我们的姑娘都能成为她人生的主角。”

“‘我们要做这件事’,讲出这句话曾经让我们充满力量,所以也想把我们的力量所带来的感受分给那些在她们自己的生命中未曾感受到过这股力量的人。”

五十几年过去了,这些女人们仍然在谈到自己绝望时遇到Janes的帮助而流泪;谈到自己第一次目睹因非正规堕胎而奄奄一息的女孩时而哽咽;谈到自己曾经见证过太多绝望而痛苦的女性时痛哭。女性已经受了很多苦,走过了很远的路,未来还有许多的苦,还有很长的路,愿每一位伟大独立妇女都能有渡己渡人的力量。

《无名姐妹》影评(三):Q&A (221020 Ray Stark Family Center)

这场QA请到了两位导演(Emma和Tia),一位Jane成员(Diane),和两位现在活跃在医疗和教学一线的嘉宾,问答都非常精彩。我根据自己在现场的笔记,后续整理成文:

The production of this documentary is a race against the time, just as the movement was a race against the court. A simple voting shows that over 95% of the audience at USC Ray Stark Family Theatre has not heard about the Jane before, making the objectives of this documentary more crucial – to tell the story of women’s just, brave, illegal activist story that hasn’t been told. One of the audience asks the director how she got into contact with so many relevant parties, not only the Janes, but their husband, the “villain” detective, and Mike, one of the first male physicians who help the Jane but has a rather complex personality. The female attorney who helped the women change the law and release the Jane members, died before the directors started this project.

We were fortunate enough to meet Diane, one of the Janes, for the Q&A. Diane didn’t go public after the victory against anti-abortionist laws; she, like many others who fought together, returned to and continued with their own lives. It was a moving moment when she said “So long, Jane” in front of the audience. Diane also wanted this film to pass on their spirits to the younger generation (who comes to the screening and shares enthusiasm in women’s rights). She said that they were just ordinary women, who rose to the occasion and worked together and made big changes eventually. “We didn’t turn any woman away because we couldn't; we were them and they were us.” Many members of the Jane had legal or illegal abortions themselves, before they realized how crucial it was to have free, accessible, and safe abortion services available. Diane herself had to be testified as psychiatrically uncapable of having children before she gets an abortion from a hospital. When she first came to the Jane, she just wanted to help out before she realized the illegality of what they were doing. The Jane was a cohesive, women-help-women group. Thanks to the orientation process and spontaneous mentorships, Diane learned from Martha how to do counseling, how to assure the desperate women. She also shared us an anecdote: she had a job outside the Jane, but because she had to use her office phone to answer calls from women with abortion needs, she got fired; later, the woman who fired Diane had to seek help from the Jane as well. It wasn’t Diane who answered the phone, but still, no one ever gets rejected by the Jane except from dire medical reasons.

Diane’s response to professionalism differs from the current medical practice. The panel reminds us to be differential with history and be open to validating different systems of care. The women’s takeover of the operations was a bold move, but it was informed by the fact that they found that Mike was not a professional doctor. “If Mike could do it, we can do it as well,” the Janes believed. Jody was the most charismatic character, as many of her peers would say, and she was the first person to do abortion operations under Mike’s instruction. Unfortunately, she died about 15 years before, but thankfully her footages were shot by another filmmaker and were reused by Tia and Emma. No matter how the medical procedures were, there was a need for a system of coworkers to perform the abortion. Apart from the legal and medical considerations, the more serious problem is the lack of a culture of permission of abortion, the alienation between the women seeking abortion and their family. Nowadays, you put yourself at more risk writing about abortion than having an actual abortion, but recently in many states other than California women are losing their rights, and the states with most healthcare needs often have the least healthcare resources. With these in mind, the film wants to reflect in history, to resist repression and the internalization of stigma and pain, to practice micro activism, to stop the judging against women who needs abortion, and to challenge the gender norms.

本文由作者上传并发布(或网友转载),绿林网仅提供信息发布平台。文章仅代表作者个人观点,未经作者许可,不可转载。
点击查看全文
相关推荐
热门推荐